Halcove:About

From Halcove
Revision as of 00:47, 21 May 2024 by Ha1vorsen (talk | contribs)

Welcome to Halcove! If you're looking for chat, assistance, queries, or something else, this is where you can find me.

If you do need me, I am always up for sharing information and having discussions in good faith. This page exists to explain the factors that go into my actions. Please also click the subheadings under each new line for further information, when applicable.

Yes, this is a manual for how you should approach me.

No, I am not memeing.

Yes, I will drag you here if you act surprised after triggering one of the scenarios detailed here.

No, I am less of an asshole than this page will make it appear (but I am, in fact, an asshole). This page really exists as "asshole-repellent", preventing issues before they occur. You should be able to see that all I ask in each of these sections ensures equity and respect during the interactions we might have.

Yes, you can probably make a LLM chatbot that completely mimics my personality just with this information alone.

Summary

For the hell of it... I asked ChatGPT to summarise this page in a full bulletpoints. If you can't be assed to read the following, at least read this...

Directness: The author emphasizes clear and concise communication, discouraging unnecessary pleasantries and filler.

Assertiveness: They set firm boundaries and are upfront about their expectations in interactions.

Logical and Analytical: The writer values reasoned arguments and evidence-based discussions over emotional appeals.

Self-awareness: They acknowledge their own tendencies and biases, and expect the same self-awareness from others.

Equity and Fairness: The author strives for fairness, treating others based on their actions and demeanor.

No-nonsense attitude: They prefer efficiency and straightforwardness, avoiding what they consider to be pointless social niceties.

Defensive: There's a protective element, as they use this guide to prevent misunderstandings and confrontations.

Intolerance for Assumptions and Disrespect: They have a low tolerance for assumptions and disrespect, expecting others to communicate directly and respectfully.

Reflective: The writer mirrors the behavior of others, responding to aggression with aggression and politeness with politeness.


Overall, the personality comes across as someone who values efficiency, directness, and respect in interactions, with little patience for ambiguity or rudeness.

If you're looking for help...

Limit pointless filler.

Time is valuable. Please don't be disrespectful by wasting it. You can be polite by including your greeting and other fluff in the same message as your actual query, or ideally leaving it out altogether.

If you include substantial filler in your message, it may cause the recipient to think that you're asking for more than what you're actually asking for. If this occurs, I'm probably going to subconsciously ignore the message until I'm able to properly read it all. If it's a simple message like "hello" from an account I'm not familiar with, and I don't know who or what I am interacting with, I may wait for you to write the reason for your appearance before making any response. The existence of spam and scam bots also contribute to this issue.

Don't "ask to ask".

Asking if it's "okay to ask" is already asking a question. If you think asking a question is bothersome, why are you doing it twice?

Eliminating this pointless fluff of "politeness" allows the question to be answered as soon as it's read, instead of making someone potentially prepare for an entire conversation that they may not be ready for. If we aren't friends, you're engaging in a transactional conversation. The only reason you're talking to me is to extract information from me. We're probably never going to talk again after the interaction. Allow people to efficiently interpret your question so they can efficiently answer them.

If you "ask to ask", I'm going to respond at whichever time is most convenient to me. There is no indication of urgency to a simple question that's "asking to ask". Why hold an expectation to someone to respond immediately to a random question?

Ask about your problem, not your solution.

This is otherwise known as "the X/Y problem". Say you want to change the Facebook app theme color. You then read online, "sending this special command to your phone via your PC can force the Facebook theme to change to dark".

Instead of asking how to change Facebook's theme, you then ask me "How can I enable developer settings and send commands to my phone from my PC?".

Instead of addressing the issue you wanted, you're trying to get help with something that may not be relevant to your end-goal at all. I could have told you to simply click a button in the Facebook app itself to achieve the same task. Less time is wasted for both parties when you ask for what you actually want.

Since there's now an entire secret boss to the question you actually asked, it's probably gonna be hard for me to stay involved with your issue once I find out there's more to the question than what you asked...

If you're looking to chat..

Avoid assumptions

Assumptions have the funny effect of loudly showcasing your subconscious conclusions. In that, things you may have never asked about may be incorrectly "true" or "false" in your personal headcanon. Your subconscious is highly influenced by internal biases. In making an assumption, instead of asking for clarification, it can be highly insulting as you are taking certain aspects of a person as a given.

If you engage in this behaviour, I'm likely to reflect it. I do hold many internal biases, but I try to actively contain them. If I notice that you either failed to contain yours, or otherwise felt that your assumption is "such an obvious conclusion from the information you had", I will reflect this behaviour and intentionally fail to contain my own biases. If it wasn't an issue for you to do so, it shouldn't be an issue for me to do so as well. I will also track this failure to properly research / ascertain information, so I may lose trust in what you say and lower credence to your statements.

  • Assuming the worst about a person because you were too egotistical to ask questions is the absolute number one way to end up on my bad side. Learn to ask questions, otherwise I will treat you like the asshole you are exposing yourself to be. There are no exceptions to this, and I will not change my attitude on this.

"Read the room"

You're told from a young age to treat people the way you want to be treated.

If I am being direct, transactional, sarcastic, friendly, quiet, or anything else: I intend to get the same out of you. Please either try to match my demeanor, and otherwise let me know if my behaviour makes you uncomfortable or just seems out of place. In almost all cases, I'm also trying to match whatever demeanor you brought to the table.

General Communication

"?"

This is a question mark. It is used to signify that the sentence preceding it is an inquiry. What is shown above is a question mark, without any words before it.

Don't do this.

There are two cases where a "?" message exists:

  • when the writer doesn't want to explicitly ask a question, and intentionally tries to make the recipient guess why the writer is confused
  • when the writer is lazy, forcing the recipient to guess which of the many things the writer could be confused about.

Don't be lazy, and don't be an asshole. If you're confused about something, ask for clarification for what you are confused about. If you send a message that's only a question mark, I am going to assume it is an error, and ignore the message until a question is asked. It's disrespectful to force someone in this scenario, and I refuse to participate in this childish game.

Ask for what you want...

Conflict Resolution

Have you ever felt like you needed to carefully navigate how you interact with me in order to avoid backlash? I know. If you're a person who often tries to dictate and control the discussion, you'll run into issues. If you do want to talk to me, remember to think about what you say before you say it. Microaggressions and unfair prejudice towards me will be remembered and met with equal flippancy.

Otherwise, I actively take care not to show disrespect towards you as long as I was not given disrespect to begin with.

If you know how to decent without needing to be prompted, we will get along. If you can't, then I don't have an issue reminding you to correct yourself before engaging in any further interactions. I don't believe in "special treatment" and will treat everyone with the same amount of praise or criticism that they deserve. If you act like a child, you'll be treated like one. If I have to treat you like a child despite your age dwarfing mine, or if you happen to be in some sort of "authoritative" position...

Well, it was obviously a shoddy position that means nothing since you hold it. Do better.

It is on you to be a decent person. I promise that I will take your lead. I will be direct in most situations, and I would appreciate your directness and truthfulness above all other qualities, namely in terms of "niceties" which I see as wasted energy. Actions speak louder than gestures.

If you show respect, there is no reason for me to be disrespectful to you. That is to say, I won't pretend to extend any angelic grace towards you just because you're in a "bad mood", which isn't an excuse to be a jerk. The personality of the person who wrote this page likely displays the following traits:

With that said, I generally don't partake in niceties, which isn't inherently disrespectful. For example, the reply "It isn't, I'm sorry." is probably going to be shortened to "No, it isn't.". It answers the question succinctly, and is rather frank, which helps cut out potential for misinterpretation.

I do not respond to emotional pleas as a form of persuasion. If you want me to take an action that I have already explicitly declined, you'll need to present a form of logical justification for it rather than beg or "guilt trip". If you actively demand me to go out of my way to help you when you've never given me the time of day or have ignored times where I've asked for similar help, search on Google for the nearest circus -- there are plenty of clowns who will take you in as one of their own.

I care for your actions, which you are personally responsible for. I expressly shed no concern about your societal status, your employment position, or any shoddy sense of authority that you may employ on yourself.

For maximum social equity, you will be treated with an identical timber as the one you approach me with.

Look at me as a mirror; if you don't like what you see, take a look at yourself first.

For example, aggressive dispositions will be met with an equally aggressive tone in response. I will be equally as pleasant as you are, otherwise.

In general, the following should also be kept in mind during interactions:

  • Any statement of fact is subject to debate.
  • Critiques, criticism, and arguments must be based on verifiable fact, unless you predicate them as an opinion.
  • Critiques, criticism, and arguments must be based on locally observed evidence, and must be backed by verifiable fact. Critique and criticism based upon assumptions or prospect inherently do not have a concrete basis in reality, and can't be used for criticism for an action that occurs in reality. Only empirical and factual evidence can be used for this purpose.