Cognition

From day one, everyone can only interpret the world around them. This eventually causes us to conclude on said interpretations based on our own personal experiences.

Which is such a naive pit to fall into.

The difference between a theory and a law lies in the fact that a law describes what happens, and a theory describes a possible interpretation or explanation as to why an event happens. The existence of a theory can only be tested via systematic

The machinations of the world that you're interpreting are not prescriptive; you don't "assign meaning" after the fact. Everything you see around you can only be described as descriptive.

Things have to make sense by default. They can only not be possible by a misguided or uninformed viewpoint. Should events not have been possible, they would have never happened. Everything happens for a reason, no matter how complicated or "unlikely" the catalysts actually happen to be.